过期罐头电脑论坛-win7、win10雨人系统下载

过期罐头电脑论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
雨人系统 过期罐头 视频编辑软件 电脑维修 win7系统下载 win10系统下载
查看: 6011|回复: 0
收起左侧

[其它] alleged that it was for a consideration of $18,000

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-3-22 09:35:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
发贴请勿包含网站外链(直接下载地址和网盘除外),屡犯者将封禁ID、网址永久屏蔽,www.gqgtpc.com感谢支持!
|

  alleged that it was for a consideration of $18,000
alleged that it was for a consideration of $18,000

[1 The principal contention of the defendant is that the notes upon which the judgment was obtained were contracted subsequent to the execution of the deed from C. W. Thebaud to his wife. Section 7307, L. O. It.,provides: Every conveyance or assignment In writingof any estatemade with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditorsas against the persons so hindered, delayed, or defrauded, shall be void. Under this provision it has been held by this court that it is immaterial whether the debt due such creditors had been contracted at the tune of the conveyance, if the parties at that time executed it for the purpose of defrauding them.other same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. &Am. Dig. Key-No. Series &Rep'r IndexesMarks v. Crow, 14 Or. 382, 13 Pac. 55; Mortonv. Denham, 39 Or. 227, 64 Pac. 3S4.[2 And where the deed Is attacked tor fraud, and it Is between near relatives, the burden is cast upon the grantee to prugg usa outlet        ove that the purchase was made without notice of the fraud and was for a valuable consideration. Weber v. Kothchild. 15 Or. 3S5, 15 Pac. 650, 3 Am. St. Rep. 162; Stubling v. Wilson, 50 Or. 282, 90 Pac. 1011, 92 Pac. S10.[3 Not only must it be alleged, but proved, that he is an innocent purchaser for a valuable consideration. Walker v. Harold, 44 Or. 205, 74 Pac. 705. It is an affirmative defense, and must be alleged and proved. Weber v. Rothchlld, supra.[4 Viewing the evidence In the light of this statement of the law, the conclusion Is unavoidable that the conveyance was fraudulent and affects Blanche Flower Thebaud. L. J. Hadley, who was for some time a director and vice president of the bank, testifying as to a talk haugg usa        d with C. W. Thebaud, says: We was talking about the notes ugg outlet usa        of the bank down there, that he owed the bank and some Brogan notes, and he told mewe was talkingugg outlet usa about these Hope notes once, and he told me that he owed those notes, that is, some notes here at the bank Hope Is connected with; he told me that he owed those notes, and he said they had been so mean about handling dealing with him that he says, 'I have got about $90,000 worth of property, and I took and transferred it all to my wife, and,' he says, 'the sons of *****es can go now, and I will pay the note when I get ready.' That was practically the conversation at that time. On cross-examination by defendants' counsel: Q. And you say that at that time Mr. Thebaud said he had about $90,000 worth of property, and he had put it out of his hands in order to beat the United States National Bank? A. That, in particular. Q. And you were then talking about this $5,000 judgment, were you? A. We were talking about thatdiscussing that at that time, generally; yes.From October, 1907, to January, 1910, C. W. Thebaud made many deposits In plaintiff bank, checking against his account every few days. Much of that time his account was overdrawn In large amounts, and, as he admits In his answer, two of these notes were given to cover such overdrafts. Many of these deposits were from the proceeds of the farm, and many of the checks were to pay uggs usa        the expense thereof. He handled the farm and its proceeds at all times as if they were his own, holding himself out as the owner, and all his credit was obtained on the inference that he still owned the farm. The wife paid nothing for it, and had knowledge of his purposes, so that according to his statements to Hadley the wife held the title in trust for him. He was a witness at the trial, but did not deny the statements attributed to him by Hadley, and testified to nptiing but the identity of some eihiki Blanche Flower Thebaud did not testify.From this state of the evidence, taken I: connection with the twelfth paragraph ithe complaint quoted above, which is not fenied, defendants are without any defense: this suit The necessary inference Is that i: the time the deed was made to the wife C W. Thebaud had in mind a prospecure atensive dealing with the bank, and Isi i purpose to do just what he afterward iii





楼主热帖
[系统应用经验技巧] windows系统无法配置无线连接怎样处
[系统应用经验技巧] Windows回收站使用攻略
[Windows10] 评论:Windows RT也属于一款Windows产品
[DV视频编辑技术] 闹钟
[Windows7] 解决Windows 7系统USB/DVD Download Tool无法
[系统应用经验技巧] 建立一个O盘,隐藏你的终身 秘密!
[Windows xp] Windows XP系统远程桌面管理工具的使用
[Windows7] Windows 7系统三步找回被删除并清空了的回收
[Windows7] win7用手动找回搜索功能
[Windows7] 提升Windows 7系统性能的超适用 方法

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

win7 64位旗舰版下载|win10系统下载|win7旗舰版|联系我们|网站地图|

GMT+8, 2016-12-3 06:22 , Processed in 0.206029 second(s), 29 queries .

官方免责声明:本站内容来自网友和互联网.若侵犯到您的版权.请致信联系,我们将第一时间删除相关内容!

Powered by Discuz!

过期罐头电脑论坛

win7旗舰版_windows10

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表